Yanuar Dwi Prastyo, Monica Vidya Tinanti, Siti Farhana


The purpose is to obtain facts and experiences that occur to students when using English private tutoring in their learning system which is described in detail using a descriptive method through perceptions from students at SMP Xaverius 1 Bandar Lampung. Private tutoring is needed for students to get more learning in the lack condition of Covid-19 and can give more benefits to improving their skill and their progress. This journal used the qualitative method. To collect the data used questionnaires and interviews. The results of this study indicate that there are several types of perceptions given by students based on what happens when using English private tutoring and are divided into four different categories in the grouping of student perceptions, comparison between school & tutoring, financial aspects, learning model system, and students' academic & quality level. The results showed positive perceptions of students and tutors.

Full Text:



Alotaibi, Ghazi N. (2014). Causes of Private Tutoring in English: Perspectives of Saudi Secondary School Students and Their Parents. The Second International Conference on Education and Language, 60-65.

Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2018). Using data and the human touch: Evaluating the NYC inter-agency campaign to reduce chronic absenteeism. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR).

Bowman-Perrott, L., Burke, M. D., Zhang, N., & Zaini, S. (2014). Direct and collateral effects of peer tutoring on social and behavioral outcomes: A meta-analysis of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 43(3), 260–285.

Braine M.E., Parnell J. (2011). Exploring Student’s Perceptions and Experience of Personal Tutors. Nurse Education Today, 31, 904-910.

Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3(2), 77–101.

Bray, M. (1999). The Shadow Education System: Private Tutoring and its Implications for Planners. Fundamentals of Educational Planning. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.

Bray, M. (2010). Researching shadow education: Methodological challenges and directions. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 3-13.

Collin English Dictionary. (2007). Definition of “tutoring”. [online]. Available at: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/tutoring. [29th November, 2021].

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Guill.K, Ludtke, Olier & Koller, Olaf. (2020). Assessing the instructional quality of private tutoring and its effects on student outcomes:

Analyses from the German National Educational Panel Study. British Journal Educational Psychology, 90, 282-300.

Gurusinghe, S.A & Ramayanake, I.S. (2021). Students’ Perception Regarding the Teaching Strategies of Government ESL School Teachers and Private Tutors: With Special Reference to a Grade Nine

Government School in Galle, Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 63-70.

Ireson, Judith. (2004). Private Tutoring: how prevalent and effective is it?. London Review of Education, 2(2), 109-122.

Jacob, R., Armstrong, C., Bowden, A. B., & Pan, Y. (2016). Leveraging volunteers: An experimental evaluation of a tutoring program for struggling readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(1), 67–92.

Jalaluddin Rakhmat. (2011). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253.

Lambert, Sylvie. G & Loiselle, Caren G. (2007). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. J Adv Nurse, 62(2), 228-237.

Leung, K. C. (2019). An updated meta-analysis on the effect of peer tutoring on tutors’ achievement. School Psychology International, 40(2), 200–214.

Levin, H. M., & Belfield, C. (2015). Guiding the development and use of cost-effectiveness analysis in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 400–418.

Lyons, M. D., & McQuillin, S. D. (2019). Risks and rewards of school-based mentoring relationships: A reanalysis of the student mentoring program evaluation. School Psychology, 34(1), 76–85.

Maduwu, byslina S.Pd. (2016). Pentingnya Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris di Sekolah. Journal Warta, 5, 1-7.

Mappiase & Sihes. (2014). Evaluation of English as a Foreign Language and Its Curriculum in Indonesia: A Review. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 7(10), 113-122.

Mondal, S & Barman, P. (2019). Perception of Secondary School Teachers and Students towards the Private Tuition. IJRAR, 6(1), 804-806.

Pustaka Kti. (2013). Definisi Tutor. [online]. Available at: http://literaturkti.blogspot.com/2013/05/definisi-tutor.html. [November 14th, 2021).

Roopa, S & Rani, MS. (2012). Questionnaire Designing for a Survey. The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 46(4), 273-277.

Sulistiyo, Ari. (2016). Manajemen Pembelajaran Kursus Bahasa Inggris pada Lembaga International Language Programs Semarang. Thesis. Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Semarang.

Sulthoni, Achmad Firdaus. (2014). Sistem Penentuan Guru Privat Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. Thesis. Teknik Informatika. Malang.

Valerio, Anna. (2013). Private tutoring in modern times. Is it really effective?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 979-980.

Wood, S., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2012). School-based mentoring for adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(3), 257–269.

Yung, Kevin Wai Ho & Chiu, Ming-Ming. (2020). Secondary school students’ enjoyment of English private tutoring: An L2 motivational self-perspective. Language Teaching Research, 00 (0), 1-23.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v5i2.1591

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 71 times
PDF - 50 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.