Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JURKAMI) is a journal that accepts contributions of writings/articles related to educational studies, teaching and evaluation of learning in the field of economic education and other economic studies, both research reports, and book reviews that have never been published in print media or electronic. This statement of scientific code of ethics is a statement of all parties involved in the process of publishing the journal Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi (JURKAMI) including managers, editors, reviewers, and authors. Ethics of scientific publications upholds three ethical values in publications, namely 1). Neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications; 2). Justice, namely giving authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors/writers; and 3.) Honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication,

Journal Manager Duties and Responsibilities (Editor in Chief)

  1. Determine the name of the journal, scientific scope, periodicity and application for accreditation if needed. Determine the membership of the editorial board.
  2. Defines the relationship between publishers, editors, reviewers and other parties to a contract.
  3. Appreciate things that are confidential, both for contributing researchers, authors/writers, editors and reviewers.
  4. Implement norms and provisions regarding intellectual property rights, especially copyright.
  5. Conduct a review of the journal's policy and submit it to the authors/authors, the editorial board, reviewers and readers.
  6. Create guidelines for rules and ethics of conduct for editors and reviewers.
  7. Publish journals regularly.
  8. Ensuring the availability of funding sources for the sustainability of journal publications.
  9. Building a collaborative network of research institutes and related agencies
  10. Prepare permits and other legal aspects.

Editor's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. Meeting the needs of readers and writers, Strive to improve the quality of publications on an ongoing basis,
  2. Implement processes to ensure the quality of published papers,
  3. Prioritizing freedom of opinion objectively,
  4. Maintain the integrity of the author's academic track record,
  5. Submit corrections, clarifications and apologies if needed,
  6. Responsible for the style and format of writing scientific papers, while the content and all statements in the written work are the responsibility of the author.
  7. Actively solicit the opinions of authors, readers, reviewers and members of the editorial board to improve the quality of publications,
  8. Conduct periodic internal evaluations of the quality of scientific journals
  9. Open-minded to new opinions or views of others that may conflict with personal opinions for the advancement of science,
  10. Avoiding objective decisions by not defending their own opinions, authors or third parties by seeking solutions that are scientifically justifiable,
  11. Encouraging writers to make improvements to their writings until they are worthy of publication.

Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers

  1. Reviewing written works and submitting the results of the study to the editor, as material for determining the feasibility of a written work to be published,
  2. The reviewer does not conduct a scientific study of the written work that involves himself, either directly or indirectly,
  3. Provide suggestions, input and positive recommendations on scientific writing manuscripts,
  4. Maintain the author's privacy by not disseminating the results of corrections, suggestions and recommendations on a manuscript,
  5. Encouraging writers to make improvements to their writings,
  6. Reviewing the written work that has been repaired in accordance with predetermined standards,
  7. The written work is reviewed in a timely manner according to the style of the publication environment based on scientific principles (methods of data collection, author's legality, conclusions, etc.) that have been determined.

Author's Duties and Responsibilities

  1. Ensure that those included in the list of authors have met the criteria as authors,
  2. Collectively responsible for the work and the content of the article includes methods, analysis, calculations and details.
  3. State the origin of resources (including funding), either directly or indirectly.
  4. Explain the limitations of the study.
  5. Respond to comments made by reviewers and the editorial board in a scientifically professional manner and in a timely manner.
  6. Inform the editor in writing if he will withdraw his written work.

Make a statement that the paper submitted for publication is original, and has not been published anywhere and in any language, and is not in the process of being submitted to another publisher.