ANALISIS KONSEP PENYUSUNAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KOGNITIF DIAGNOSTIK YANG RESPONSIF TERHADAP PERBEDAAN KEBUTUHAN BELAJAR SISWA SD

Dwi Novita Sari, Hukma Fikria Adira, Futry Ayu Lestari, Shaleh Shaleh

Abstract


This study analyzes the concept of preparing cognitive-diagnostic assessment instruments that are responsive to the different learning needs of elementary school students through a systematic literature review approach based on PRISMA 2020. From the initial 300 articles, ten selected studies were analyzed in depth to examine the theoretical basis, development procedures, validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the instruments to the diversity of students' cognitive abilities. The results of the synthesis show that effective diagnostic instruments generally emphasize misconception detection, conceptual understanding, and reasoning processes through the use of multi-tier formats, digital assessments, and adaptive approaches. Various studies report that valid and reliable instruments are able to improve the accuracy of teacher diagnosis and support differentiated learning. However, challenges are still found in the form of low differentiation of certain questions, limitations of implementation in the classroom, and lack of optimal integration of assessments into follow-up strategies. These findings confirm the need for a conceptual model of instruments that is more adaptive, comprehensive, and aligned with today's learning needs.

Keywords


Diagnostic assessment; Cognitive instruments; Primary school; Differentiated learning.

References


A. Asnawi, Tengku Muhammad Sahudra, Dini Ramadhani, Ary Kiswanto Kenedi, Ghenny Aosi, Muhammad Rizki Wardhana, & Nadhira Azra Khalil. (2024). Development of Digital Diagnostic Test Instruments for Differentiated Learning Process in Elementary Schools. ResearchGate.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. Longman.

Arifin, Z. (2020). Evaluasi pembelajaran. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Ary Forniawan & Dwi Retno Wati. (2024). Analisis dan Tindak Lanjut Hasil Asesmen Diagnostik Kognitif Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. E-Journal Metro Univ.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Inside the black box: Assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan.

Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Formative assessment strategies.

Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2019). Educational assessment of students. Pearson.

ES Utaminingsih. (2024). Development of science literacy competency evaluation instrument (elementary school). Sister IAIN Kudus.

Fisher, D. (2020). Diagnostic assessment models in elementary education.

Gipps, C. (2012). Beyond testing.

Hafizhah Rahmiati Auliya, Martha Christianti, & Benny Hidayat. (2024). Development of Multi-Tier Diagnostic Tests for Primary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal UNY.

Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom.

J Juliani, Yusrizal, & Ismul Huda. (2024). Development of Four Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Tests to Know Students’ Misconceptions in Science Learning. Academia.

J Supriono. (2024). Development of cognitive diagnostic assessment instruments … to measure scientific literacy in primary school. Jurnal Unggulan Unri.

Jang, H. (2020). Cognitive diagnostic assessment in basic education.

Kaifiyatus Syahroh & Reinita Reinita. (2024). Validitas Asesmen Diagnostik Kognitif Berbantuan Quizizz Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila di Sekolah Dasar. E-Journal UNP.

Musrifatus Shaleha, Miftahul Hakim, & Haning Hasbiyati. (2024). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Diagnostik Kognitif Berbantuan Quizizz pada Materi Sistem Pernapasan Manusia. Ejurnal.

Mustafa, M. (2017). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa sekolah dasar.

Nugroho, S. (2021). Desain asesmen responsif.

Papalia, D., & Martorell, G. (2021). Experience human development. McGraw-Hill.

Rahmawati, I. (2020). Efektivitas asesmen diagnostik dalam mendeteksi miskonsepsi siswa.

Ratnaya, I. G., Noviyanti, P. L., & Wibowo, S. E. (2024). SEBUAH SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: PEMBELAJARAN DIFERENSIASI DALAM DUNIA PENDIDIKAN. MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 9(2), 185–193.

Ricky, A. S., Umamah, F., Amalia, S. N., & Trisnawati, E. (2025). SYSTEMATIC LITERATUR REVIEW (2021-2025): PENGEMBANGAN E-BOOK INTERAKTIF DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA DI SEKOLAH DASAR. EDUTECH : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Berbantuan Teknologi, 5(3), 567–574.

Sani, R. A. (2019). Pembelajaran berbasis asesmen.

Siringo Ringo, S. (2025). Systematic Literature Review dengan Metode Prisma: Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi pada Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 209–226.

Supriyadi, T. (2020). Diferensiasi pembelajaran di sekolah dasar.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom.

Tri Wahyuni, Matsuri, & Roy Ardiansyah. (2024). Analisis tahapan asesmen diagnostik kognitif dalam pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Universitas Sebelas Maret.

UR Mayanesa. (2024). Development of a Quizizz-Based Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Instrument in the Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS). UNP Kediri.

Widodo, A., & Kistoro, H. C. (2019). Analisis asesmen kognitif siswa sekolah dasar.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jpdp.v12i1.5686

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.