Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal of Mathematics Education (J-PiMat) (e-ISSN: 2684-7981) is a scientific journal that publishes scientific articles from research, literature studies, ideas, theoretical applications, critical analysis studies, and class action studies in the science of Mathematics Education. J-PiMat publishes twice a year, May and November, published by the Mathematics Education Program, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang, Indonesia.

The scope of scientific articles that can be published in J-PiMat are as follows:

1. Mathematics Education and Teaching

2. Method / Model / Strategy for Learning Mathematics,

3. Media and Multimedia Learning Mathematics

4. Curriculum in Mathematics Teaching,

5. Assessment and Evaluation in Teaching Mathematics,

6. Development of Mathematics Teacher Professionals,

7. Ethnomatematics in Mathematics Learning

8. Didactic Design in Mathematics Learning

9. Lesson Study in Mathematics Learning

Each article to be published will through a double blind review process submitted to the reviewer.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics Statement

J-PiMat is a peer-reviewed national journal. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing the article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher (STKIP Persada Khatulistiwa Sintang). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. There are three aspects of publication ethics. They are fair play (editor evaluates manuscripts without regarding the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic, citizenship, or political philosophy of author), confidentiality (editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscript to anyone other than the staff involved in publication), and disclosure and conflict of interest (unpublished materials in submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the permission of the author).

Duties of Reviewers

  1. Peer-reviewer helps the editor make decision through editorial communication with the author to improve the manuscript.
  2. The assigned reviewer that feels unqualified to review the manuscript should confirm the editor.
  3. The manuscripts from the author must be kept secret.
  4. Reviewing process should be conducted objectively. Any criticism not related to the article is forbidden.
  5. Reviewer should identify the similarity between the existing unpublished manuscripts with the new manuscript received. Any indication that showed similarity or overlap between these manuscripts should be reported to the editor.
  6. Reviewer should not criticize the manuscripts on the basis of subjectivity i.e. having either conflict, competition, similar interest, or relationship with the author. All reviewing processes uphold high objectivity.

Duties of Author

  1. The author should be qualified as teacher, lecturer and researcher to submit the article.
  2. The author should be fully responsible for the content of the article, including method, analysis, calculation, and the detail of explanation.
  3. Authors should present the accurate data and provide the raw data in connection with the paper for editorial review and should be prepared to provide public access to such data.
  4. The author should ensure that they have written entirely original works and if the author has used the work or word of others, this should be appropriately cited or quoted.
  5. The limitation of research should be explained.
  6. The sources of research should be explained, including financial funding.
  7. The author should respond the reviewer’s comment immediately through editorial communication.
  8. The author should write an official confirmation, if they want to cancel the publication.
  9. Authors should make a statement confirming or showing that the article is an original work and has never been published in other publishers or other languages.