Cognitive Load Factor in Failure to Solve the Simple Problem of Prospective Mathematics Teachers

Barep Yohanes

Abstract


The lack of problem-solving skills among prospective mathematics teachers has an impact on the future development of school mathematics instruction. Problem solving is one of the process standards that must be implemented in mathematics education. Therefore, the problem-solving abilities of prospective mathematics teachers must be enhanced to support the advancement and improvement of mathematics learning. This study analyzes the cognitive load factors contributing to the failure of prospective mathematics teachers in solving simple problems, particularly in determining the length of the sides of a right triangle when the hypotenuse is known. Based on Cognitive Load Theory (CLT), errors in problem solving can be influenced by intrinsic cognitive load (material complexity), extraneous cognitive load (instructional design), and germane cognitive load (the effort invested in learning). This study employed a qualitative method, using error analysis from tests and interviews. The results show that students experienced failures in understanding the problem, planning strategies, executing strategies, and evaluating outcomes. The study concludes that the complexity of the intrinsic cognitive load was not balanced by an increase in germane cognitive load through effort investment in problem-solving activities. Germane cognitive load serves as a supporting factor in developing problem-solving skills to overcome the challenges of element interactivity associated with intrinsic cognitive load.

Keyword: Cognitive Load, Failure, Problem Solving, Prospective Mathematics Teachers


Full Text:

PDF

References


Costley, J., & Lange, C. (2017). The effects of lecture diversity on germane load. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(2), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2860

Darmawan, P., Yohanes, B., & Hadi, M. R. (2023). Analisis Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Calon Guru Matematika Menggunakan APKL, USG, dan Diagram Fishbone. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 6(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2023.6.2.199-218

de Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory, Educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0

Debue, N., & van de Leemput, C. (2014). What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(SEP), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01099

Ginns, P., & Leppink, J. (2019). Special Issue on Cognitive Load Theory: Editorial. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09474-4

Gupta, U. (2019). Interplay of Germane Load and Motivation During Math Problem Solving using Worked Examples. Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 30(1), 67–71.

Huang, Y. H. (2018). Influence of instructional design to manage intrinsic cognitive load on learning effectiveness. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2653–2668. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90264

Kalyuga, S. (2011). Informing: A cognitive load perspective. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 14(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.28945/1349

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., Kirschner, F., & Zambrano, J. R. (2018). From Cognitive Load Theory to Collaborative Cognitive Load Theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9277-y

Klepsch, M., Schmitz, F., & Seufert, T. (2017). Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997

Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1058–1072. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1

Lin, J. J. H., & Lin, S. S. J. (2014). Cognitive Load for Configuration Comprehension in Computer-Supported Geometry Problem Solving: an Eye Movement Perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9479-8

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 38(1), 43–52.

NCTM. (2000). Principle and Standarts for School Mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

NCTM. (2010). Executive Summary Principles and Standarts For School Mathematics. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 18(11), 719. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-0806(98)80482-6

PERMENDIKBUDRISTEK NOMOR 5 TAHUN 2022, MENTERI PENDIDIKAN, KEBUDAYAAN, RISET, DAN TEKNOLOGI REPUBLIK INDONESIA, (2022).

Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L., & DeBusk-Lane, M. (2019). Implicit Theories, Working Memory, and Cognitive Load: Impacts on Creative Thinking. SAGE Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019835919

Subanji. (2011). Matematika Sekolah dan Pembelajarannya. J-Teqip, 1, 1–12.

Subanji. (2015). Construction Error Theory: Concept and Mathematics Problems Solving. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY (Vol. 82, Issue 1). Cambridge University Press. http://www.springer.com/series/8640

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5

Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205

Yohanes, B. (2024). Teori Beban Kognitif dan Berpikir Pseudo Pada Pemahaman Definisi Operasi Perkalian Calon Guru Matematika. Jurnal Edupedia, 8(2), 109–118. http://studentjournal.umpo.ac.id/index.php/edupedia

Yohanes, B., & Darmawan, P. (2022). Resiliensi matematis calon guru matematika dalam pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 6(2), 96–107. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jkpm

Yohanes, B., & Yusuf, F. I. (2021a). Intrinsic Cognitive Load in Online Learning Model of School Mathematics 1 in Covid-19 Pandemic Period. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 9(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v9i2.7292

Yohanes, B., & Yusuf, F. I. (2021b). Intrinsic Cognitive Load in Online Learning Model of School Mathematics 1 in Covid-19 Pandemic Period. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 9(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v9i2.7292

Yohanes, B., & Yusuf, F. I. (2021c). Teori Beban Kognitif: Peta Kognitif Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Pada Matematika Sekolah. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2215. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4033




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/j-pimat.v7i1.4687

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 217 times
PDF - 76 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.