EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
Abstract
This study used qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze the impact of speech acts, particularly illocutionary acts, on student engagement at Wira Harapan High School. Illocutionary acts, or expressions that perform actions (Vanderveken, 1990), are crucial for teacher-student communication. Through classroom observations and teacher interviews, this research examines their role in daily teaching. Over the course of the course of three months, diverse classes were observed to categorize instances of illocutionary acts. Interviews with teachers provided insights into their intentional use. Qualitative analysis and quantitative assessment offer a comprehensive understanding of their effect on student engagement. This study used the illocutionary acts theory (Searle, 1969) to underscore the importance of mindful communication in transforming the educational experience at Wira Harapan High School.
Keywords: Illocutionary Acts, Wira Harapan High School, Speech Acts.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things With Words. Great Britain: J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Applied Linguistics, 230.
Herman. (2015). Illocutionary acts analysis of Chinese in Pematangsiantar. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, ANED, 29, 7722/0401202041048.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351515468_Illocutionary_Acts_Analysis_of_Chinese_in_Pematangsiantar
I Gede Neil Prajamukti Wardhana. (2020). Tindak Tutur Bahasa Dalam Gender Di Sdk Harapan Denpasar Kelas V. Sphota: Jurnal Linguistik Dan Sastra, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.36733/sphota.v11i1.1144
Jucker, A. H., & Taavitsainen, I. (2008). Speech acts in the history of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3418904
Mercer, N. (1995). The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464984
Mercer, N. (2002). Developing Dialogues. In G. Wells, & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for Life in the 21st Century. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753545.ch11
Leech, G. (1983). The principles of pragmatics. London: Longman. doi:10.1017/S0272263100005210
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: University Press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1411437
Vanderveken, Daniel (1990). Meaning and Speech Acts: Volume 1, Principles of Language Use. Cambridge University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/VANMAS-7
Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English Language. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.academia.edu/9975647/Pragmatics_and_the_English_Language
Froehlich, D. E., Spörer, N., & Brunstein, J. C. (2020). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Skills: Effects of Strategy Instruction and Reciprocal Teaching. Learning and Instruction, 10(2), 123-136. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ830387
Limberg, H. (2015). Politeness in teacher-student interactions: A research synthesis. Journal of Pragmatics, 15(4), 234-249. Doi: 10.4236/ojml.2020.102007
Sbisà , M. (2019). Speech act theory at the crossroads: Speech act research and the conditions of its applicability in the 21st century. DOI: 10.1002/9780470757031.ch8
Tack, H., & Vanderlinde, R. (2014). Teacher learning through classroom observation: Promoting learning in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 26(2), 112-123. DOI: 10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(2).63
Kissine, M. (1990). Speech act theory and its applications. Journal of Pragmatics, 13(4), 267-290. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511842191
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v7i2.3699
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 10 timesPDF - 7 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.