COGNITIVE LEVELS OF INDONESIAN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENGLISH TEXTBOOK QUESTIONS: A REVISED BLOOM'S TAXONOMY ANALYSIS

Muhammad Yusril Rizqi Hidayat, Wahyu Indah Mala Rohmana

Abstract


English textbooks play a crucial role in English Language Teaching (ELT) and cognitive development, particularly through the questions they incorporate, which is essential in shaping students’ analytical and reasoning skills. Previous studies have investigated the cognitive demands of textbook questions, where Lower-Order Thinking Skills (LOTS) are more prevalent than Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). This imbalance raises concerns regarding the effectiveness of textbooks in fostering students' critical thinking abilities. While these studies have primarily focused on specific sections or types of questions, there has been limited research examining the overall cognitive levels of all questions within a single textbook. This study aims to analyze the cognitive levels of the questions in the “English for Nusantara” textbook for eighth-grade students using Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Using a descriptive content analysis method both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used to classify and calculate the frequency of the cognitive levels.  The result of the study shows that the textbook is more inclined to LOTS than HOTS. In particular, comprehension (C2) was the most frequently used cognitive process (37.28%), followed by application (C3) (28.92%), while analysis (C4)  (11.50%), evaluation (C5) (3.48%), and generation (C6)  (8.36%) were used least frequently. This means that students are mostly engaged in the lower order cognitive processes such as comprehension and application. The study suggests that while the textbook supports basic language skills, it provides insufficient emphasis on critical thinking. Thus, curriculum developers and teachers should incorporate more HOTS-based questions to align with the Curriculum's objectives.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W. (2005). Educational evaluation objectives, evaluation, and the improvement of education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.05,004

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl Peter W Airasian, D. R., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). Taxonomy for assessing a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives.

Assaly, I. R., & Smadi, O. M. (2015). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of master class textbook’s questions. English Language Teaching, 8(5), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n5p100

Basori, B., Mubarok, H., Rohmana, W. I. M., Bisriyah, M., Jayanti, S. D., & Maharany, E. R. (2023). An English placement test at three different periods: the implementation and the test administrators’ views. Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues, 6(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v6i2.19100

Bloom. (1956). I taxonomy of educational objectives the classification of educational goals handbook1 cognitive domain longmans.

Febriyani, H., & Mu’arifah, S. (2024). Muatan soal LOTS dan HOTS kompetensi sastra buku teks bahasa Indonesia kelas VII terbitan erlangga (content of LOTS and HOTS questions literary competency Indonesian class VII textbook published erlangga).

Fitri Asih, N., & Linuwih, S. (2022). Analysis of four-tier diagnostic test on the topic of temperature and heat in high school. Phys. Comm, 6(1), 1–6. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/pc

Forehand. (2010). Emerging perspective on learning, teaching and technology. The University of Georgia.

Hafidah. (2023). Analysis of reading questions in English workbooks for SMP/MTs by using revised bloom taxonomy (a descriptive qualitative study).

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.

Krippendorff, Klaus. (2004). Content analysis : an introduction to its methodology. Sage.

Mutiara Ayu. (2020). Evaluation cultural content on English textbook used by EFL students in Indonesia. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 6(3), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v6i3.1925

Öztürk, E., & Thesis, M. A. (2019). An evaluation of secondary school 9th grade English program and 9th grade coursebook activities from the perspective of Bloom’s revised taxonomy.

Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167

Qasrawi, R., & Beniabdelrahman, A. (2020). The higher and lower-order thinking skills (hots and lots) in unlock English textbooks (1st and 2nd editions) based on Bloom’s taxonomy: an analysis study. In International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET) (Vol. 7, Issue 3).

Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., Rahayuningsih, Y. S., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka belajar di sekolah penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6313–6319. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3237

Resnick, L. B. (1976). The nature of intelligence (First Edition). Library of Congress Cataloging.

Resnick, L. B. (1987). The 1987 presidential address learning in school and out. http://er.aera.net

Sucipto, S., & Cahyo, S. D. (2019). A content analysis of the reading activities in “bright 2” an English textbook for junior high school students. English Language Teaching Educational Journal (ELTEJ), 2(1), 39–46.

Sudijono, Anas. (2013). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan. Radja Grafindo Persada.

Susandari, W. F. A. (2020). Evaluation of exercises compatibility between revised Bloom’s taxonomy and 2013 curriculum reflected in English textbook. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej

Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Ulum, Ö. G. (2016). A descriptive content analysis of the extent of Bloom’s taxonomy in the reading comprehension questions of the course book Q: Skills for success 4 reading and writing. Qualitative Report, 21(9), 1674–1683. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2172




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v8i1.4565

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 561 times
PDF - 235 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.