Pengembangan asesmen kompetensi pedagogik pada mahasiswa calon guru biologi

Ina Setiawati, Anna Fitri Hindriana

Abstract


Instumen penilaian pedagogik belum maksimal digunakan di FKIP Universitas Kuningan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan asesmen pedagogik yang dapat mengukur kompetensi pedagogik pada mahasiswa calon guru biologi dengan menggunakan rubrik penilaian. Metode penelitian adalah research and development. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan lembar validasi tim expert, lembar kuesioner respon mahasiswa. Hasil uji validasi tim ahli didapat rata-rata skor 4,18 (sangat valid), hasil uji kelayakan didapat nilai sebesar 83% (sangat layak). Hasil Pengujian validitas instrument diperoleh nilai KMO pada asesmen kemampuan merancang pembelajaran sebesar 0,55>0,5, asesmen melaksanakan pembelajaran 0,50>0,5, asesmen mengevaluasi 0,74>0,5 dan secara keseluruhan nilai KMO>0,5. Hasil penilaian kompetensi pedagogik mahasiswa ujicoba 1 menunjukkan 80% berada level kompeten secara parsial dalam merancang pembelajaran, 56% berada pada level kompeten dalam melaksanakan simulasi pembelajaran, 32% berada pada level kompeten parsial dalam melakukan evaluasi pembelajaran, sehingga dapat disimpulkan valid dan layak untuk digunakan.

Kata kunci: Asesmen, kompetensi, pedagogik, mahasiswa calon guru


Development of pedagogical competency assessment in pre-service teacher of biology. Pedagogical assessment instruments have not been used maximally at FKIP Universitas Kuningan. This research aims to develop pedagogical assessments that can measure pedagogical competencies in Biology pre-service teacher by using an assessment rubrik. The research method was research and development. Data collection was carried out using expert team validation sheets, student response questionnaire sheets. The results of the expert team validation test obtained an average score is 4.18 (very valid), the feasibility test results obtained a value is 83% (very feasible). The instrument testing the validity results value in the assessment of the ability to design learning is 0.55>0.5, the assessment to carry out learning is 0.50>0.5, the evaluation evaluates is 0.74>0.5, overall value is KMO > 0.5. The pedagogical competency evaluation results of pilot 1 showed students were partially competent in designing learning is 80%, students were at the competent level in carrying out learning simulations is 56%, students were partial competence in evaluating learning is 32%, so that are concluded valid and can using.

Keywords: Assessment, competency, pedagogical, pre-service teacher



Full Text:

PDF

References


Ada, J.H., & Azisah, S. (2016). The contribution of teachers’ pedagogical competence toward the effectiveness of teaching of english at mtsn balang-balang. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 2(02), 238-251. DOI: 10.24252/Eternal.V22.2016.A5

Anif, S. (2018). The effectiveness of a professional competence development model based on an initial competence test on biology teachers: a case study in surakarta. International Jour¬nal of Assesment and Evaluation, 25(2), 15-21. DOI: 10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v25i02/1-12

Anif, S., Sutama, Prayitno, H.J., & Idrus, N.B.M. (2019). Effectiveness of pedagogical competence: a development model through association of biology teachers’ forum. Jurnal pendidikan IPA Indonesia (JPII), 8(1), 22-31. DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v8i1.17176

Arends, R.I. (2008). Learning to teach: belajar untuk mengajar. Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar.

Arifa, F.N., & Prayitno, U.S. (2019). Improvement of education quality: pre-service teacher professional education programs in meeting the needs of professional teachers in indonesia. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 10(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.22212/aspirasi.v10i1.1229

Brown, N. (2008). Assessment in the professional experience context. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 5(1), 88-101. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol5/iss1/8

Donnelly. (2007). Perveived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 117-129. https://arrow.tudublin.ie/ltcart/25

Emiliasari, R.N. (2018). An analysis of teachers’ pedagogical competence in lesson study of MGMP SMP majalengka. ELTIN Journal, 6(1), 22-33. DOI: 10.22460/eltin.v6i1.p22-33

Hakim, L. (2017). Development strategy of pedagogical competence to improve professionalism of islamic education teacher. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 207-220. DOI:

15575/jpi.v3i2.1406

Hasse, S., Joachim, C., Bögeholz, S., & Hammann, M. (2014). Assessing teaching and assessment competences of biology teacher trainees: lessons from item development. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(3), 191-205. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED548764.pdf

Hidayati, N., Irmawati, F., & Prayitno, T.A. (2019). Peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa biologi melalui multimedia stem education. JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 4(2), 84-92. DOI: 10.31932/jpbio.v4i2.536

Hindriana, A.F., & Setiawati, I. (2018). The development of autentik assessment rubrik for assessing undergraduate students learning and performance. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 1(1), 21-28. https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/IJLI/article/viewFile/1279/949

Jordan, P., Phillips, M., & Brown, E. (2004). We train teachers: why not supervisors and mentors? Physical Educator, 61(4), 219-221.

Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. https://www.danapayne.net/uploads/5/9/7/7/59770463/insearchofelusiveaddie.pdf

Naylor, D.A., Campbell, E.G., & Maloney, C. (2015). Learning to teach: what do pre-service teachers report. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(11). DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n11.7

Ningtiyas, F.A., & Jailani. (2018). Does teacher’s training affect the pedagogical competence of mathematics teachers?. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1097 (2018) 012106. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012106

Nurlaelah, I., Handayani, & Setiawati, I. (2017). Perkembangan calon guru profesional yang berfokus pada pedagogical content knowledge (pck) pada kelas akademik atas dan akademik bawah di universitas kuningan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sain II. Fakultas Biologi Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Olsson, T., & Roxa, T. (2013). Assessing and rewarding excellent academic teachers for the benefit of an organization. European Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 40-61. DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2013.778041

Tang, S.Y.F., & Chow, A.W.K. (2006). Communicating feedback in teaching practice supervision in a learning-oriented field experience assessment framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1066-1085.

Ulla, M.B. (2016). Pre-service teacher training programs in the philippines: the student-teachers practicum teaching experience. EFL Journal, 1(3), 235-250. DOI: 10.21462/eflj.v1i3.23




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jpbio.v5i1.531

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 812 times
PDF - 471 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.