STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT IN ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES (ESP) GROUP DISCUSSIONS: A CASE STUDY AT A UNIVERISTY

Yusawinur Barella, Isnaini Nur Safitri, Anindhiasti Ayu Kusuma Asri

Abstract


English for Specific Purposes (ESP) constitutes a pedagogical approach to English language acquisition. It provides students by learning language in a certain context. Studies on implementing group discussion have been done, but not focusing on their engagement. Thus, this study investigates student engagement in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) group discussions at a university level. ESP courses are designed to meet the specific language needs of students in professional or academic contexts, enhancing their communication skills relevant to their fields. The research employs a qualitative methodology, utilizing thematic analysis to explore students' experiences and perspectives. Data were collected through classroom observations and interviews with eight undergraduate students from two higher education institutions in Indonesia. The findings reveal that group discussions in ESP classes significantly enhance students' oral communication skills, teamwork, and problem-solving abilities. However, challenges such as unequal participation and language anxiety were also identified. The study underscores the importance of effective moderation and structured discussions to ensure equitable participation and maximize engagement. These insights have practical implications for improving instructional strategies in ESP courses, ultimately fostering a more engaging and effective learning environment.

Keywords: English for Specific Purposes, group discussion, students’ engagement 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aderibigbe, S. A. (2020). Online discussions as an intervention for strengthening students’ engagement in general education. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040098

Anthony, L. (2009). ESP at the center of program design. In K. Fukui, J. Noguchi, and N. Watanabe (Eds.) Towards ESP bilingualism [in Japanese],. Osaka University Press.

Asmali, M. (2021). Integrating Technology into ESP Classes: Use of Student Response System in English for Specific Purposes Instruction. Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 86–104. http://www.tewtjournal.org

Asri, AAK., Rahayu, A., & Yoga, P.P. (2021). The Perceptions of Students on Collaborative Learning and Its Effect on English Speaking Skill. Frasa: English Education and Literature Journal. https://doi.org/10.47701/frasa.v2i1.2041

Bekteshi, E., & Xhaferi, B. (2020). An Analysis of English for Specific Purposes among University Students. Educational Process: International Journal, 9(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2020.92.2

Biria, R., & Tahririan, M. H. (1994). The methodology factor in teaching ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90027-2

Bui, H. P. (2022). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective ESP teaching. Heliyon, 8(9), e10628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10628

Dobakhti, L. (2021). A Study of the Role of English Language for General, Specific and Academic Purposes. Language Related Research, 12(4), 565–596. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.12.4.18

Ertmer, P. A. (2006). Examining the Effect of Small Group Discussions and Question Prompts on Vicarious Learning Outcomes yekyung Lee in full collaboration with. ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education), 39(1), 66–80. www.iste.org.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Heron-Hruby, A., Trent, B., Haas, S., & Allen, Z. C. (2018). The Potential for Using Small-Group Literature Discussions in Intervention-Focused High School English. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 34(5), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1457459

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Kamberi, L., Ameti, M., & Urlica, A. A. D. (2020). On the Quality and Relevance of English for Specific Pruposes in Higher Education. International Journal for Quality Research, 14(1), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR14.01-19

King, R. B. (2015). Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: A latent growth model study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.002

Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054

Lesiak-Bielawska, E. D. (2015). Technology in ESP pedagogy. English for Specific Purposes World, 16(48), 1–23. www.esp-world.info

Martín-González, D., & Chaves-Yuste, B. (2024). From English for General Purposes To English for Specific Purposes: the Role of Motivation in Higher Education in Spain. ESP Today, 12(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2024.12.1.2

Nurmasitah, S., Faridi, A., Utomo, A. B., & Astuti, P. (2018). The efficacy of focus group discussion in teaching ESP speaking skill for prospective vocational school teacher. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1941. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5028112

Nurmasitah, S., Utomo, A. B., & Faridi, A. (2019). Penerapan Model Online Group Discussion untuk Meningkatkan Partisipasi Mahasiswa pada Kelas English for Specific Purposes. Jurnal Profesi Keguruan, 5(1), 15–22. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpk

Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Students’ emotional and cognitive engagement as the determinants of well-being and achievement in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 67, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.05.001

Plesca, G. (2018). The Essence of English for Specific Purposes. June 2016, 0–4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323254539_The_Essence_of_English_for_Specific_Purposes%0D

Rahmat, H., & Jon, R. B. (2023). Benefits and Challenges of Group Discussion as Creative Learning Strategies in Speaking Class. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 6(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v6i1.13804

Sibo, I. P. . H., Celis, D. A. G., Liou, S., Koh, B., & Leung, A. K. Y. (2023). The role of argumentation on high- and low-creative performing groups: A structuration analysis of undergraduate students’ group discussion. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101217

Sudarmika, P., Santyasa, I. W., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2020). Comparison between Group Discussion Flipped Classroom and Lecture on Student Achievement and Student Characters. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 171-186.

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1259663

Wester, J. S. (2020). Students’ Possibilities to Learn From Group Discussions Integrated in Whole-class Teaching in Mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788148

Zhang, J., Niu, C., Munawar, S., & Anderson, R. C. (2016). What Makes a More Proficient Discussion Group in English Language Learners’ Classrooms? Influence of Teacher Talk and Student Backgrounds. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(2), 183–208. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24889914

Zhu, X. X. (2010). A study of the relationship between fear of failure, learning engagement and academic performance in high school students (Master’s thesis). [Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China]. https://www.doc88.com/p-5794120159939.html

Heron-Hruby, A., Trent, B., Haas, S., & Allen, Z. C. (2018). The Potential for Using Small-Group Literature Discussions in Intervention-Focused High School English. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 34(5), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1457459

Sibo, I. P. . H., Celis, D. A. G., Liou, S., Koh, B., & Leung, A. K. Y. (2023). The role of argumentation on high- and low-creative performing groups: A structuration analysis of undergraduate students’ group discussion. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101217




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v7i2.4028

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 23 times
PDF - 16 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.