Nurul Noviana, Priyatno Ardi


Learner autonomy is learners’ ability to take charge, set the rules and style of their learning as the goals. Profiling autonomous learners can be seen in the TOEFL preparation program class. TOEFL preparation program is a course subject to provide learners in achieving the TOEFL score target to fulfill requirements as ELT students. The class provides learners with more opportunities in studying pre-face-to-face sessions by giving the students worksheets. These opportunities directed the learners to exercise their English. This study investigates the learning activities conducted by EFL learners in the TOEFL class and the use of learner autonomy in the pre-face-to-face session in the TOEFL preparation program. The study employed a qualitative narrative inquiry, grounded in phenomenological research. Data were collected and analyzed qualitatively by understanding the meaning of lived experiences. Data were gathered by interviewing 5 participants and observing the TOEFL class. Based on the findings, there were numbers of extension language activities held by the learners. There were five themes categories of learner autonomy as strategy, learner autonomy as perceptions, learner autonomy as behavior, learner autonomy as the interdependence of social autonomy, and experiences from learning TOEFL test preparation program in learners’ lived experiences.

Full Text:



Ardi, P. (2017). Promoting learner autonomy through schoology m-learning platform in an EAP class at an Indonesian university. Teaching English with Technology, 17(2), 55–76.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education. In C. Shortt (Ed.), آب و خاک (8th ed.). Retrieved from

Benson, P., & Huang, J. (2008). Autonomy in the transition from foreign language learning to foreign language teaching. DELTA Documentacao de Estudos Em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada, 24(SPL.ISS.), 421–439.

Benson, P., & Reinders, H. (2011). Beyond the language classroom. New York: Palgrave macmillan.

Chusanachoti, R. (2009). Efl Learning Through Language Activities. ProQuest, 1–287.

Dang, T. T., & Robertson, M. (2010). Impacts of learning management system on learner autonomy in EFL learning. International Education Studies, 3(3), 3–11.

de Oliveira e Paiva, V. L. M., & de Carvalho Fidelis Braga, J. (2008). The complex nature of autonomy. DELTA Documentacao de Estudos Em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada, 24(SPL.ISS.), 441–468.

Heigham, J., & Crocker, R. A. (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: a practical introduction. New York: Palgrave macmillan.

Hyland, F. (2004). Learning autonomously: Contextualising out-of-class english language learning. Language Awareness, 13(3), 180–202.

Inozu, J., Sahinkarakas, S., & Yumru, H. (2010). The nature of language learning experiences beyond the classroom and its learning outcomes. US-China Foreing Lenguage, 8(1), 14–22. Retrieved from filename%3DThe_nature_of_la

Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335.

Lamb, M. (2004). “It depends on the students themselves”: Independent language learning at an Indonesian state school. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17(3), 229–245.

Nakamura, I. (2008). Understanding how teacher and student talk with each other: An exploration of how “repair” displays the co-management of talk-in-interaction. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 265–283.

Neupane, M. (1970). Learner Autonomy: Concept and Considerations. Journal of NELTA, 15(1–2), 114–120.

Pearson, N. (2004). The idiosyncrasies of out-of-class language learning : A study of mainland Chinese students studying English at tertiary level in New Zealand. Proceedings of the Independent Learning Conference 2003, (September), 1–12.

Sanprasert, N. (2010). The application of a course management system to enhance autonomy in learning English as a foreign language. System, Vol. 38, pp. 109–123.

Shams, I. E. (2013). Hybrid learning and Iranian EFL learners’ autonomy in vocabulary learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1587–1592.

Soto, C., Gutiérrez de Blume, A. P., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., & Riffo, B. (2019). Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–20.

Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is Learner Autonomy and How Can It Be Fostered. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 37–48. Retrieved from

Tseng, W. T., Liou, H. J., & Chu, H. C. (2020). Vocabulary learning in virtual environments: Learner autonomy and collaboration. System, 88, 102190.

Țurloiu, A., & Stefánsdóttir, Í. S. (2011). Learner autonomy theoretical and practical information for language teachers.

Xhaferi, B., & Xhaferi, G. (2011). Developing learner autonomy in higher education in Macedonia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 150–154.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 75 times
PDF - 18 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.