ANALISIS KEBUTUHAN GURU TERHADAP PENDEKATAN DESIGN THINKING DALAM PENGEMBANGAN PEMBELAJARAN DI SMPN 58 JAKARTA
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Pendekatan Design Thinking merupakan fondasi krusial bagi guru untuk merancang pembelajaran yang inovatif dan kreatif. Namun, implementasinya di SMPN 58 Jakarta belum dilakukan secara sistematis, dan formal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebutuhan guru terhadap pelatihan, pendampingan, dan implementasi praktis Design Thinking guna meningkatkan kapabilitas guru dalam mendesain pembelajaran. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui observasi dan wawancara mendalam kepada guru di SMPN 58 Jakarta. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun belum diterapkan secara formal, sebagian guru telah menerapkan prinsip-prinsip dasar Design Thinking, khususnya pada tahap empathize (memperhatikan karakteristik peserta didik) dan define (menyusun pembelajaran dari mudah ke sulit). Guru juga menunjukkan antusiasme yang tinggi terhadap metode pembelajaran berbasis proyek dan media kreatif. Temuan ini mengindikasikan adanya potensi dan kesiapan yang besar dari guru untuk mengadopsi pendekatan ini secara penuh apabila diberikan pelatihan yang terstruktur dan berkelanjutan.
Kata Kunci: design thinking, analisis kebutuhan, pengembangan pembelajaran
ABSTRACT
The Design Thinking approach serves as a critical foundation for teachers to devise innovative and creative instructional designs. However, its implementation at SMPN 58 Jakarta has not been carried out systematically or formally. This study aims to analyze teachers' needs for training, mentoring, and practical implementation of Design Thinking to enhance their capabilities in developing effective learning experiences. Using a qualitative methodology, data were collected through observations and in-depth interviews with teachers at SMPN 58 Jakarta. The results indicate that although Design Thinking has not been formally applied, some teachers already implement its basic principles particularly the empathize stage (addressing student characteristics) and the define stage (structuring lessons from simple to complex). Teachers also demonstrated strong enthusiasm for project-based learning methods and the use of creative media to foster student engagement. These findings suggest significant potential and readiness among educators to fully adopt Design Thinking, provided structured and sustained training is made available. Thus, tailored professional development is urgently needed to empower teachers in designing innovative, student-responsive learning environments that support 21st-century skill development.
Keywords: design thinking, need analysis, learning development
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustiani, M. 2024. “Teacher Professional Education Program in Indonesia: Benefit and Challenge.” ENRICH: Education, Language and Linguistic 5(2):28–37. doi: 10.36546/enrich.v5i2.1314.
Apriani, L., Wulandari, W., Hartatik, &. Rafi Bagus Adi Wijaya. 2024. “Teachers’ Challenges in Implementing the Discovery Learning Model: A Qualitative Study in Secondary Schools.” Lentera Sriwijaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika 6(2):26–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.36706/jls.v6i2.100.
Apriliyani, T. .. 2023. “Design Thinking Sebagai Model Pembelajaran Pada Jenjang SD-SMA Dalam Konteks Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (Systematic Literature Review.” Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Bachtiar & Puspitasari, M. 2024. “Barriers and Strategies in Implementing Innovative and Collaborative Learning: A Case of Indonesian English Language Teaching.” IJEE: Indonesian Journal of English Education 11(1):61–76.
Boog, Ben. 2005. “Qualitative Research Practice.” Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice 14(2):47. doi: 10.18352/jsi.39.
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
Dike, Daniel, & Parida, Lusila. 2016. “Persepsi Dan Konsepsi Mutu Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar.” Pendidikan Dasar PerKhasa 2(2):197–211.
Dike, Daniel, Lusila Parida, and Ivan Stevanus. 2020. “Micro Strategy and Character Educational Transformation in Elementary School during the Covid-19 Pandemic of Sintang Distric, West Kalimantan Province.” European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine 7(8):775–86.
Handayani, L., & Zen, E. F. 2024. “Penggunaan Design Thinking Dalam Mengatasi Kebosanan Peserta Didik Di Kelas.” Journal of Innovation and Teacher Professionalism 3(2):333–39.
Hartoyo, J., Ahmad, S., & Fitriani, Y. 2021. “The Challenges of Implementation of Professional Teachers Competency in the Digital Era.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 5(2):4917–4921.
Henriksen, D., Gretter, S., & Richardson, C. 2018. “Design Thinking and the Practicing Teacher: Addressing Problems of Practice in Teacher Education.” Teaching Education 31(1):1–21.
Huang, W., Li, X., & Shang, J. 2023. “Gamified Project-Based Learning: A Systematic Review of the Research Landscape.” Sustainability 15(2):940.
Kawulich, Barbara. 2004. “Qualitative Data Analysis Techniques.” Conference: RC33 (ISA) (January 2004):96–113.
Khairati, S. 2024. “Kualitas Pendidikan Di Indonesia, Faktor Penyebab Dan Solusi.” Kompasiana.
Laksono, K., Rohimah, N. K., & Fauziati, E. 2024. “Exploring Challenges of Indonesian EFL Teachers in Implementing Differentiated Instruction in ELT Classroom.” PANYONARA: Journal of English Education 6(2):1–14.
Li, T., & Zhan, Z. A. 2022. “A Systematic Review on Design Thinking Integrated Learning in K-12 Education.” Appl. Sci 12(16):8077.
Manuru, Y. H. 2023. “Pelatihan Dan Pengembangan Kemampuan Design Thinking Berbasis Project-Based Learning Bagi Guru SMA Swasta Al-Maksum Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan Dalam Inovasi Perancangan Perangkat Pembelajaran.” Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 29(3):441–44.
Mardiah, A., Irwanto, I., & Afrizal, A. 2023. “Taking Design Thinking to Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review over a Past Decade.” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 36(3):1–11.
Menno, A.W.M., Simanjutak, V.I.Y., & Linda, D. 2024. “Overcoming Self-Efficacy Challenges in Teachers and Prospective Teachers: Key Factors and Solutions.” Indonesian Journal of Education Research and Review 7(2):285–297.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. 2018. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications.
Nisa, C. & Persada, A. .. 2024. “Pemodelan User Experience Pembelajaran Tata Surya Menggunakan Metode Design Thinking Untuk Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar.” JIPI; Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Informatika 9(3):1534–46.
Olwan, S. 2025. “Greatness in Indonesia’s Education Landscape: A Statistical Overview.” Learning Mole, February 4.
Rustam & Saputra. A.B. 2024. “Design Thinking Dalam Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Bahasa Indonesia Mahasiswa Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru Di SMA.” Semantik 13(1):43–56.
Safrudin, M. .. 2024. “Factors in the Declining Quality of Education in Indonesia.” Kompasiana.
Sulistiyo, E. .. 2025. “Kurikulum Dan Pelatihan Guru Di Indonesia.” Pelataran.
Sumanto, N.L., & Sembiring, A. 2023. “Pelatihan Berpikir Desain Dan Teknologi Digital Dalam Implementasi Merdeka Belajar Di SDN 105300 Deli Tua Sumatera Utara.” Jurnal Pengabdian UNDIKMA 4(3):668–74.
Suyadi. 2016. “School Culture and Teacher Teaching Method Effectiveness in Indonesia.” Pp. 259–68 in International conference on education and psychology 2016At. Kinabalu: Universiti Malaysia Sabah.
Tanang, H., Djajadi, M., Abu, B., Mokhtar, M. 2014. “Challenges of Teaching Professionalism Development: A Case Study in Makassar, Indonesia.” Journal of Education and Learning 8(2):132–43.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. 2009. 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Widiastuti, I. 2025. “Assessing the Impact of Education Policies in Indonesia: Challenges, Achievement, and Future Direction.” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan 17(2):1955–64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/ve.v16i2.5362
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 36 timesPDF - 12 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 VOX EDUKASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1.jpg)

















.png)



