Integrasi Metacognitive Questions Pada Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematis
Abstract
Understanding mathematical concepts is a primary objective in mathematics education, yet many students still face difficulties in understanding mathematical concepts. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of integrating Metacognitive Questions (MQ) into the Discovery Learning model on students' mathematical concept understanding in social arithmetic. A quantitative quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group design was employed. The sample consisted of 34 students in the experimental class and 34 students in the control class. The independent sample t-test on pretest scores indicated that both groups had equivalent initial abilities (p-value = 0.289 > 0.05). Essay test instruments were validated and tested for reliability. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test, Levene's homogeneity test, and the independent samples t-test on N-Gain scores. The findings revealed that the mean N-Gain of the experimental class (0.58; moderate category) was higher than that of the control class (0.43; moderate category), with a difference of 0.15 and a p-value (two-tailed) of 0.008 < 0.05. The experimental class achieved a mean posttest score of 8.35 out of a maximum score of 12 (high category). Thus, the integration of Metacognitive Questions into the Discovery Learning model resulted in a higher improvement in students' mathematical concept understanding compared to the scientific approach.
Keywords: Metacognitive Questions, Discovery Learning, understanding of mathematical concepts
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Rineka Cipta.
Bawadi, S., Pujiastuti, H., & Fathurrohman, M. (2023). Pemahaman Konsep Matematika dengan Teknik Scaffolding : Systematic Literature Review. MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 9(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202391.400
BSNP. (2006). Standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah: Standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar SMP/MTs. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Dewi, S. V. (2021). Pengembangan model pembelajaran berbasis Metacognitive Questions (mq) untuk mendukung keterampilan problem posing Mahasiswa calon Guru [Universitas Negeri Malang]. http://repository.um.ac.id/id/eprint/263339
Dewi, S. V., Wahyu, R., & Habsyi, R. (2026). Mapping Mathematical Literacy in Combinatorics through Keirsey Temprament Groups and Metacognitive Questions ( MQ ): A Multiple Case Study of Four Undergraduates. Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 14(1), 188–207.
Fitri, L. S. (2023). Analisis penyelesaian soal matematika materi pecahan pada siswa mi ditinjau dari teori nolting skripsi.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Guntara, Y. (2021). Normalized Gain: Ukuran Keefektifan Treatment. Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, 2–5.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Haiprilisya, N., Sukestiyarno, & A, N. C. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Berbantuan Pertanyaan Metakognitif Melalui Web-based mathematics learning. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (PROSNAMPAS), 3(1), 256–261. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/view/613
Kemendikbud. (2015). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013: Model pembelajaran Discovery Learning. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
Kramarski, B., & Zemira R. Mevarech. (2003). Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in the Classroom: The Effects of Cooperative Learning and Metacognitive Training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040001281
Kusaka, S., & Ndihokubwayo, K. (2022). Metacognitive strategies in solving mathematical word problems: a case of Rwandan primary school learners. SN Social Sciences, 2(9), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00495-5
Mangobi, J., Mantik, M. R., & Regar, V. E. (2025). ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA SPLDV DENGAN FONG ’ S SCHEMATIC MODEL. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 561–570.
Marliana, P., Zamnah, L. N., & Sunaryo, Y. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pebelajaran Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa. Prosiding Galuh Mathematics National Conference ( GAMMA NC), 28–32.
Rakhmawati, D., Hendracipta, N., Pribadi, R. A., & Nurhasanah, A. (2024). Peran Guru Dalam Mengoptimalkan Model-Model Pembelajaran Berorientasi Pada Keterampilan Abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Flobamorata, 5(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.51494/jpdf.v5i1.1352
Ruhama, M. A. H., Hairun, Y., & Bani, A. (2021). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIS SISWA SMP NEGERI 1 KOTA TERNATE PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN LINEAR SATU VARIABEL. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Matematika, 1(2), 118–133.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Syaiful, S., Aprillya, S., & Anggraeni, E. (2020). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Everyone is a Teacher Here (ETH) Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika. Jurnal Gantang, 5(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v5i1.1562
Syamsidah, Jusniar, Ratnawati, & Muhiddin, A. (2022). Model Discovery Learning. Depublish Publisher.
Umam, M. A., & Zulkarnaen, R. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Dalam Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. Jurnal Educatio, 8(1), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i1.1993
Wass, R., Rogers, T., Brown, K., Smith-han, K., Tagg, J., & Gallagher, S. (2023). Pedagogical training for developing ?udents ’ metacognition : implications for educators. International Journal for Academic Development, 28(3), 234-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2023.2246442
Wildaniati, Y., Pika, M., Selvi, L., & Juiltaning, M. (2021). KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIS UNTUK GURU DAN CALON GURU MATEMATIKA (Y. Yuyun & E. W. S. Wahyuni (eds.)). Metrouniv Press.
Xie, Y., Zeng, F., & Yang, Y. (2024). A meta-analysis of the relationship between metacognition and academic achievement in mathematics: From preschool to university. Acta Psychologica, 249(September), 104486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104486
Zalukhu, F. G., Telaumbanua, Y. N., & Lase, S. (2024). Pengaruh Scientific Approach Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa SMP. J-PiMat, 6(2), 1499–1508.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/j-pimat.v8i2.6912
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.







