UNMASKING LINGUISTIC POWER DYNAMICS: EXPLORING POLITENESS VIOLATIONS IN THE “FERDI SAMBO” COURTROOM
Abstract
In the courtroom, all participants are expected to cooperate fully to clarify the case. This research aimed to investigate the types of politeness violations committed by the participants in the Ferdi Sambo case and the causes of these violations. The participants in this study included judges, the defendant, witnesses, advocates, and public prosecutors. This research employed a qualitative-descriptive approach. The techniques for analyzing the data included identification, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. During data identification, the violations were classified using Leech's (1983) politeness strategy theory. The findings revealed that the types of politeness violations included refusal, interruption, sarcasm, emotional outbursts, and non-verbal cues. Additionally, the causes of these violations were attributed to the participants' mood, emotions, and the pressure they experienced during the trial. This research provides significant benefits, particularly for English students, by enhancing their cultural awareness, professional communication skills, and conflict resolution abilities. Understanding politeness norms can help students become more aware of cultural differences in communication, which is essential for effective interaction in diverse contexts.
Keywords: Ferdi Sambo Case; Politeness; Violation; Courtroom;
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alafnan, M. A. (2014). Politeness in business writing: The effects of ethnicity and relating factors on email communication. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4, 275-289. DOI:10.4236/ojml.2014.42022
Ardi, N., Mangsor, M. M., & Ahmad, A. (2021). Politeness Strategies in the Criminal Trial. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i6/10324
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universal of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarck, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Correo, C. B. (2014). Politeness strategies deployed by Filipinos in asynchronous computer mediated discourse. Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 2, 76-102. https://doi.org/10.59960/2.a4
Creswell, J. (2015). 30 Essential Skills for The Qualitative Researcher. Los Angeles: CA: SAGE.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence (Vol. 28). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Elisya, I. P. (2018). Types and functions of politeness violation in the court session “kopi sianida”. Salingka, 15(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.26499/salingka.v15i01.250
Kithenge, J. K. (2018). Unmasking Face Threatening and Face Saving Acts Of Politicians: A Case Study Of Mwingi Region Politicians. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi.
Leech, G. N. (1983). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics.
Nisa, E. K., Rustono, R., & Haryadi, H. (2021). The violation of politeness maxim principles found in skinnyindonesian24 youtube channel. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia,10(3), 227-237. DOI 10.15294/SELOKA.V11I1.52518
Oandasan, R. (2021). A pragmatic investigation of linguistic politeness and power relations in request emails. Asian Journal of English Language Studies (AJELS). Volume 21. https://doi.org/10.59960/9.a2
Revita, & Oktavianus. (2013). Kesantunan Dalam Bahasa Minangkabau. Padang: Minangkabau Press.
Rohmahwati, A., & Yuliasri, I. (2017). Violation of politeness maxims in the television series the big bang theory. English Education Journal, 7(1), 66-72. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v7i1.14688
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Thomas, & Jenny. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
Ulandari, O., & Ramdhani, I. S. (2023). Analysis of violations of the principle of language politeness in the sultan entertainment talk show program on sctv. JETISH: Journal of Education Technology Information Social Sciences and Health, 2(1), 51-54. DOI: 10.57235/jetish.v2i1.197
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v8i1.4752
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 226 timesPDF - 89 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


















