ANALISIS KONSEP PENYUSUNAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KOGNITIF DIAGNOSTIK YANG RESPONSIF TERHADAP PERBEDAAN KEBUTUHAN BELAJAR SISWA SD

Dwi Novita Sari, Hukma Fikria Adira, Futry Ayu Lestari, Shaleh Shaleh

Abstract


This study aimed to analyze the development of cognitive-diagnostic assessment instruments that are responsive to differences in elementary students’ learning needs through a systematic literature review using the PRISMA 2020 approach. From an initial 300 articles, ten selected studies were analyzed in depth to examine theoretical foundations, development procedures, validity, reliability, and the responsiveness of instruments to variations in students’ cognitive abilities. The synthesis results indicate that effective diagnostic instruments generally emphasize the detection of misconceptions, conceptual understanding, and reasoning processes through the use of multi-tier formats, digital assessment, and adaptive approaches. Several studies reported that valid and reliable instruments improve teachers’ diagnostic accuracy and support differentiated instruction. However, challenges remain, including low discrimination power of certain items, limited classroom implementation, and suboptimal integration of assessment results into follow-up instructional strategies. In conclusion, the findings highlight the need for a more adaptive, comprehensive, and contextually relevant conceptual model of assessment instruments aligned with current learning demands.

Keywords


Diagnostic assessment; Cognitive instruments; Primary school; Differentiated learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Asnawi, Tengku Muhammad Sahudra, Dini Ramadhani, Ary Kiswanto Kenedi, Ghenny Aosi, Muhammad Rizki Wardhana, & Nadhira Azra Khalil. (2024). Development of Digital Diagnostic Test Instruments for Differentiated Learning Process in Elementary Schools. ResearchGate.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. Longman.

Arifin, Z. (2020). Evaluasi pembelajaran. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Ary Forniawan & Dwi Retno Wati. (2024). Analisis dan Tindak Lanjut Hasil Asesmen Diagnostik Kognitif Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. E-Journal Metro Univ.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Inside the black box: Assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan.

Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Formative assessment strategies.

Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2019). Educational assessment of students. Pearson.

ES Utaminingsih. (2024). Development of science literacy competency evaluation instrument (elementary school). Sister IAIN Kudus.

Fisher, D. (2020). Diagnostic assessment models in elementary education.

Gipps, C. (2012). Beyond testing.

Hafizhah Rahmiati Auliya, Martha Christianti, & Benny Hidayat. (2024). Development of Multi-Tier Diagnostic Tests for Primary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal UNY.

Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom.

J Juliani, Yusrizal, & Ismul Huda. (2024). Development of Four Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Tests to Know Students’ Misconceptions in Science Learning. Academia.

J Supriono. (2024). Development of cognitive diagnostic assessment instruments … to measure scientific literacy in primary school. Jurnal Unggulan Unri.

Jang, H. (2020). Cognitive diagnostic assessment in basic education.

Kaifiyatus Syahroh & Reinita Reinita. (2024). Validitas Asesmen Diagnostik Kognitif Berbantuan Quizizz Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila di Sekolah Dasar. E-Journal UNP.

Musrifatus Shaleha, Miftahul Hakim, & Haning Hasbiyati. (2024). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Diagnostik Kognitif Berbantuan Quizizz pada Materi Sistem Pernapasan Manusia. Ejurnal.

Mustafa, M. (2017). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa sekolah dasar.

Nugroho, S. (2021). Desain asesmen responsif.

Papalia, D., & Martorell, G. (2021). Experience human development. McGraw-Hill.

Rahmawati, I. (2020). Efektivitas asesmen diagnostik dalam mendeteksi miskonsepsi siswa.

Ratnaya, I. G., Noviyanti, P. L., & Wibowo, S. E. (2024). SEBUAH SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: PEMBELAJARAN DIFERENSIASI DALAM DUNIA PENDIDIKAN. MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 9(2), 185–193.

Ricky, A. S., Umamah, F., Amalia, S. N., & Trisnawati, E. (2025). SYSTEMATIC LITERATUR REVIEW (2021-2025): PENGEMBANGAN E-BOOK INTERAKTIF DALAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA DI SEKOLAH DASAR. EDUTECH : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Berbantuan Teknologi, 5(3), 567–574.

Sani, R. A. (2019). Pembelajaran berbasis asesmen.

Siringo Ringo, S. (2025). Systematic Literature Review dengan Metode Prisma: Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi pada Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 209–226.

Supriyadi, T. (2020). Diferensiasi pembelajaran di sekolah dasar.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom.

Tri Wahyuni, Matsuri, & Roy Ardiansyah. (2024). Analisis tahapan asesmen diagnostik kognitif dalam pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Universitas Sebelas Maret.

UR Mayanesa. (2024). Development of a Quizizz-Based Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Instrument in the Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS). UNP Kediri.

Widodo, A., & Kistoro, H. C. (2019). Analisis asesmen kognitif siswa sekolah dasar.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jpdp.v12i1.5686

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 2 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.