CRITICAL THINKING TEST DEVELOPMENT of THE SUMATIVE FINAL SEMESTER (SAS) ENGLISH at MTs (ISLAMIC JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL) as BANK of ENGLISH TEST BASED ON GOOGLE FORM

M. Saufi Rahman, M. Riffani, Mukarramah Mukarramah

Abstract


This study develops a critical thinking assessment for the Summative Final Semester (SAS) English Exam at Madrasah Tsanawiyah (MTs). The goal of study to know the quantitative characteristic of critical thinking test of Summative Final Semester (SAS) using google form. This study a Research and Development approach, test items were designed based on the curriculum and validated by experts. Trials test were conducted with 120 students to know difficulty, discriminant, validity, and reliability by statistical. The results indicated while students performed well on language proficiency tasks, they faced challenges with critical thinking questions, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive preparation in this area. Values of expert validation is more 0,78, validation items is > 0,3,  reliability is 0.92, difficulty is easy, medium and hard, and discriminant is good. The digital platforms used Google Forms to create interactive assessments, not only measure language skills but also assess and develop critical thinking.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. In L. W. Airasian, K. A. Cruikshank, R. E. Mayer, P. R. Pintrich, J. Raths, & M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Longman Inc (Abridged). Longman.

Banta, T. W., & Palomba, C. A. (2015). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2015). Educational Assessment of Students. In Text with Loose-Leaf Version -- Access Card Package.

Castro, S. (2018). Google Forms Quizzes and Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) Model Integration. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 6(2), 4–14.

Ennis, R. H. (1985). A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. In Educational Leadership

Hofer, S. I., Schumacher, R., & Rubin, H. (2017). The Test of Basic Mechanics Conceptual Understanding (bMCU): Using Rasch Analysis to Develop and Evaluate an Efficient Multiple Choice Test on Newton’s Mechanics. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–20.

Kaplan, R., & Saccuzzo, D. (2017). Psychological testing; principles, applications, & issues, Ninth editon. In Cengage Learning. www.cengage.com.

Karyono, H. (2019). Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan KWLTerhadap Kemampuan Membaca Teks Report Siswa Kelas IX SMP Negeri 2 Balongpanggang. Jurnal Education and Development, 7(3), 7.

Khunaifi, A. R., Ilham, & Suratmoko, B. (2020). Pelatihan Bahasa Inggris Berequivalent TOEFL Pada Reading Test CBT Terhadap Mahasiswa Semester Akhir di Universitas Muhammadiyah. 5(2), 192–198

Liu, O. L., Mao, L., Frankel, L., & Xu, J. (2016). Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: The HEIghtenTM Approach and Preliminary Validity Evidence. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(5), 677– 694

Mardapi, D. (2016). Pengukuran Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan (1st ed.). Nuha Medika

Mendikbudristek, R. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi RI Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar Isi pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah

Ningsih, D. R., Ramalis, T. R., & Purwana, U. (2018). Pengembangan Tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Berdasarkan Analisis Teori Respon Butir. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 3(2), 45.

Rahman, M. S. (2021). Analysis Regression and Path Model: the Influence Both Instagram and Tiktok in Improving Students Vocabulary. SKETCH JOURNAL: Journal of English Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 10-22.

Rustam, R., & Priyanto, P. (2022). Critical thinking assessment in the teaching of writing Indonesian scientific texts in high school. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(1), 12–25.

Seifert, T. (2020). Student Assessment in Online Learning : Challenges and Effective Practices During Covid-19. Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning, pp. 106-10(2001), 1–4.

Szabo?, G. (2008). Applying Item Response Theory in Language Test Item Bank Building (Vol. 10). Peter Lang.

Wahyuni, F. A. (2018). Blended Learning: Dua Metode (Synchronous and Asynchronous) Untuk Matakuliah Writing Materi Argumentative Essay. JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran): Kajian dan Riset Dalam Teknologi Pembelajaran, 3(2), 137-143.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v8i2.4674

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 24 times
PDF - 20 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.