Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep dan Gambaran Keterampilan Mengajar Guru Melalui IHT Matematika Aktif

Yeyen Marhaenia; Supratman Supratman; Diar Veni Rahayu

doi:10.31932/j-pimat.v8i2.6580

Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep dan Gambaran Keterampilan Mengajar Guru Melalui IHT Matematika Aktif

Yeyen Marhaenia, Supratman Supratman, Diar Veni Rahayu

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of implementing Active Mathematics In-House Training (IHT) on improving teachers’ understanding of mathematical concept and teaching skills at SDN Karsanagara. The study was conducted because continuous professional development is essential to enhance teacher competence and improve the quality of mathematics learning in primary schools. A quantitative approach was employed using a pre-experimental design with a one-group pretest-posttest model. The participants were teachers who attended the training program. Data were collected through tests of mathematical concept understanding, observation sheets of teaching skills, and questionnaires on teachers’ responses to the training. Test data were analyzed by comparing pretest and posttest scores, while observation and questionnaire data were analyzed descriptively using percentages. The findings showed a significant increase in teacher’s understanding of mathematical concepts, as indicated by higher posttest scores compared to pretest score (t (5) =17,62, p < 0.05). Teachers’ teaching skills were categorized as good after the training, and their responses toward the program were highly positive. These results indicate that school-based training programs such as Active Mathematics IHT can be an effective strategy for strengthening teacher competence and improving instructional quality in primary schools.

Keyword: active mathematics In-House Training, teacher competence, understanding of mathematical concepts, teaching skills, primary school.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher Education around the World: What Can We Learn from International Practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 219–309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399

Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best Practices in Teachers’ Professional Development in the United States. Psychology, Society & Education, 7(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515

Djajadi, M. (2025). Efektivitas In-House Training Berbasis AI dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Widyaiswara di BPSDM Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Widyaiswara, 5(3), 13–26.

Emmer, E. T., & Sabornie, E. J. (2015). Handbook of Classroom Management (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Garet, Michael S, Porter, Andrew C, Desimone, Laura, Birman, Beatrice F, & Yoon, Kwang Suk. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching on Student Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371

Huda, M. (2017). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran: Isu-Isu Metodis dan Paradigmatis. Pustaka Pelajar.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Panduan pengembangan keprofesian berkelanjutan melalui In-House Training (IHT).

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822

Latifa, U., Indrasari, P., Amami Pramuditya, S., & Asnawati, S. (2025). Connecting Concepts and Representations in Mathematics : A. 04(2), 100–113.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.

OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2020). Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Rismawati, M., & Yunista. (2019). Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa SD Kelas III Menggunakan Pembelajaran CTL. J-PiMat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 1–10.

Safitri, E. M., & Bektiarso, S. (2023). In-house training: peningkatan kompetensi guru melalui implementasi projek penguatan profil pelajar pancasila (P5). Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 6, 3485–3491.

Santrock. (2018). Educational Psychology (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sari, M., & Kurniawan, R. (2022). Keterampilan Membuka Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6154–6162. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3121

Silberman, M. L. (2016). Active Learning: 101 Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Nuansa Cendekia.

Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (12th ed.). Pearson Education.

Susanto, H., & Prasetyo, A. (2023). Refleksi Pembelajaran sebagai Upaya Pengembangan Profesional Guru. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(2), 1875–1886. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v7i2.4012

Titsworth, S., Mazer, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Two Meta-analyses Exploring the Relationship between Teacher Clarity and Student Learning. Communication Education, 64(4), 385–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/j-pimat.v8i2.6580