STUDENTS’ WRITING ERROR WRITTEN BY EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP JOSEPH KHATULISTIWA SINTANG
Abstract
The background of this research is students’ errors in writing descriptive texts. The students do not understand the correct structure of writing descriptive text. The objective of this research is to find out the types of errors and to identify the dominant types of errors that found in students’ writing products. The subject of this research is the students’ writing descriptive text products written by eighth grade students of SMP Joseph Khatulistiwa Sungai Tebelian. This research used qualitative method, by classifying the errors using Surface Strategy Taxonomy. It consisted of four types of errors in the students’ writing descriptive text product. These were omission, addition, misformation and misordering. Qualitative data was collected from documentation of students’ writing descriptive text products. Qualitative data were analyzed through collection of a sample of learner language, identification of errors, description of errors and explanation of errors. The data analysis in this research was taken from 10 students of SMP Joseph Khatulistiwa Sungai Tebelian. The researcher analyzed 10 worksheets of students writing products. The researcher found the total of students’ errors were 46 errors of students errors. The finding showed there were four types of errors such as 26 errors of omission on percentage 57%, 12 errors of misformation on percentage 26%, 6 errors of addition on percentage 13%, and 2 errors of misordering on percentage 4%. The dominant type of error was omission with 27 errors.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahamed, Fawzi Elatayeb Yousuf., & Othman, Hatim Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed. (2019). Analysis and assessment of lexical errors committed by Saudi EFL University students in descriptive essay writing. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research,7(6), 1-26.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principle of language learning and teaching. New Jersey: Longman.
Christensen, L., Johnson, B. and Turner, L., (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis. Boston: Pearson.
Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. London: Oxford University Press.
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fitri I., Eripuddin & Rahayu, P (2017). An analysis of the students’ skill in writing descriptive text at the eighth grade of SMPN 7 Tambusai Utara. E-journal University Pasir Pengaraian,3(1), 1-5.
Irawansyah. (2017). Why study error?. Indonesia Journal of Education, 4(2), 120-129.
Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre , text, grammar. Australia: A UNSW Press Book.
Richards, J., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Richards, J., C. (1973). Error analysis perspectives on second language acquisition. New York: Longman.
Sahal, V. (2018). Students’ Errors in Using Present Tense in Writing Descriptive Text (Thesis). Faculty of Education and Teacher Training Ar-Raniry Islamic University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Sijono & Ilinawati. (2020). Errors and mistake found in non-english study program students writing products. Journal of English Education Study,3(2),159-168.
Vera, B., Haryudin, A., & Herdiyanti, W. (2019). Error analysis on the students writing of simple present tense in a descriptive text. Professional Journal Of English Education, 2(4), 514-520.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v6i1.2257
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 395 timesPDF - 245 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


















